Key result
Clinical disease registries in acute myocardial infarction have diversified to offer information on epidemiology, risk modelling, quality improvement, and original research.
Clinical disease registries play a crucial role in providing epidemiological and clinical information for acute myocardial infarction that complements data from randomized controlled trials.
Supports AMI registry use for quality metrics and risk models; leaves open optimal integration with RCT evidence for practice.
Disease registries, containing systematic records of cases, have for nearly 100 years been valuable in exploring and understanding various aspects of cardiology. This is particularly true for myocardial infarction, where such registries have provided both epidemiological and clinical information that was not readily available from randomised controlled trials in highly-selected populations. Registries, whether mandated or voluntary, prospective or retrospective in their analysis, have at their core a common study population and common data definitions. In this review we highlight how registries have diversified to offer information on epidemiology, risk modelling, quality assurance/improvement and original research-through data mining, transnational comparisons and the facilitation of enrolment in, and follow-up during registry-based randomised clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reza Ashrafi (2014) conducted a review in acute myocardial infarction. Clinical disease registries was evaluated. Clinical disease registries in acute myocardial infarction have diversified to offer information on epidemiology, risk modelling, quality improvement, and original research.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: