Key result
Participants with unrecognized MI were less likely to use cardioprotective medications and have controlled LDL cholesterol than those with recognized MI (LDL control PR 1.35; 95% CI 1.19-1.52).
Why the study?
Are individuals with unrecognized myocardial infarction less likely to use cardioprotective medications and achieve risk factor control compared to those with recognized myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=21,036)
Yes
Are individuals with unrecognized myocardial infarction less likely to use cardioprotective medications and achieve risk factor control compared to those with recognized myocardial infarction?
Effect estimate: PR 1.35 (95% CI 1.19-1.52)
Patients with unrecognized myocardial infarction are significantly undertreated with cardioprotective medications and have poorer lipid control compared to those with recognized MI, highlighting a missed opportunity for secondary prevention.
Suggests gaps in secondary prevention for unrecognized MI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with unrecognized myocardial infarction (UMI) have similar risks for cardiovascular events and mortality as those with recognized myocardial infarction (RMI). The prevalence of cardioprotective medication use and blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol control among individuals with UMI is unknown. METHODS: Participants from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who were recruited between May 2004 and October 2007 received baseline twelve-lead electrocardiograms (n = 21,036). Myocardial infarction (MI) status was characterized as no MI, UMI (electrocardiogram abnormalities consistent with MI without self-reported history; n = 949; 4.5%), and RMI (self-reported history of MI; n = 1574; 7.5%). RESULTS: For participants with no MI, UMI, and RMI, prevalence of use was 38.4%, 44.4%, and 75.7% for aspirin; 18.0%, 25.8%, and 57.2% for beta blockers; 31.7%, 38.7%, and 55.0% for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers; and 28.1%, 33.9%, and 64.1% for statins, respectively. Participants with RMI were 35% more likely to have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 100 mg/dL than participants with UMI (prevalence ratio = 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.52). Blood pressure control (,140/90 mmHg) was similar between RMI and UMI groups (prevalence ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.13). CONCLUSION: Although participants with UMI were somewhat more likely to use cardioprotective medications than those with no MI, they were less likely to use cardioprotective medications and to have controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than participants with RMI. Increasing appropriate treatment and risk factor control among individuals with UMI may reduce risk of mortality and future cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levitan et al. (2013) conducted a cross-sectional in Unrecognized myocardial infarction (n=21,036). Unrecognized myocardial infarction vs. Recognized myocardial infarction and no MI was evaluated on Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 100 mg/dL (PR 1.35, 95% CI 1.19-1.52). Participants with unrecognized MI were less likely to use cardioprotective medications and have controlled LDL cholesterol than those with recognized MI (LDL control PR 1.35; 95% CI 1.19-1.52).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: