Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What is the relationship between democracy and hegemony in Gramsci's Prison Notebooks ? Salvadori and Galli della Loggia argue that hegemony is best understood as a theory of dictatorship and is therefore incompatible with democracy. Vacca argues that hegemony is inconceivable in the absence of democracy. I bridge these divergent readings by making two arguments. First, hegemony is a form of rationalized intellectual and moral leadership, and therefore depends on liberal democratic institutions. Second, hegemony is established through revolution. Gramsci thus paradoxically combines a deep appreciation for liberal democracy with a basically Leninist conception of politics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dylan Riley (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: