This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study investigates the outcomes of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated with a doxorubicin-based regimen (CHOP) and a pirarubicin-based regimen (THP-COP). Newly diagnosed patients with PTCL between 2001 and 2021 were classified by initial treatment, either CHOP or THP-COP regimen. The treatment response, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Overall, 65 patients were analyzed, with 41 classified into the CHOP group and 24 into the THP-COP group. Dose-intensified regimen was applied in 22 patients (53.7%) in the CHOP group and 16 (66.7%) in the THP-COP group. When stratified by treatment, the complete response (CR) rates in the CHOP group and the THP-COP group were 66% and 46% (P = 0.273), the 3-year EFS rates were 52.1% and 29.2% (P = 0.0492), and the 3-year OS rates were 72.7% and 48.6% (P = 0.0718), respectively. When stratified by treatment intensity, the CR rates in the dose-intensified group and the conventional dose group were 65% and 50% (P = 0.230), the 3-year EFS rates were 45.9% and 39.6% (P = 0.995), and the 3-year OS rates were 61.1% and 66.4% (P = 0.267), respectively. This study revealed no significant advantage of the THP-COP regimen over the CHOP regimen regarding treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed PTCLs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iriyama et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: