Key result
Computerized edge-detection software significantly lowered the intraobserver coefficient of variation for flow-mediated dilation compared to traditional manual measurements (6.7% vs 24.8%, P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does a computerized edge-detection software system improve the reproducibility of brachial artery ultrasound analysis compared to traditional manual measurements?
Does a computerized edge-detection software system improve the reproducibility of brachial artery ultrasound analysis compared to traditional manual measurements?
A novel computerized edge-detection software system significantly improves the reproducibility of brachial artery ultrasound measurements compared to manual methods, reducing the required sample size for clinical studies.
Brachial artery ultrasound is commonly employed for noninvasive assessment of endothelial function. However, analysis is observer dependent and susceptible to errors. We describe studies on a computerized edge-detection and wall-tracking software program to allow more accurate and reproducible measurement. In study 1, three purpose-built Perspex phantom arteries, 3.00, 4.00, and 6.00 mm in diameter, were measured with the software. There was a mean bias of 11 microm (P < 0.001 at each level) between known and measured values; the mean resolving power of the software was estimated as 8.3 microm. In study 2, the mean intraobserver coefficient of variation of repeated measures of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) using the software (6.7%) was significantly lower than that for traditional manual measurements using the intima-lumen interfaces (24.8%, P < 0.05) and intima-media interfaces (32.5%, P < 0.05). In study 3, 24 healthy volunteers underwent repeat testing twice within 1 wk; the coefficients of variation for between-visit reproducibility of FMD and response to glyceryl trinitrate using the software were 14.7 and 17.6%, respectively. Assuming 80% power and an alpha of 0.05, eight subjects with matched controls would be required, in a parallel designed study, to detect an absolute 2.5% change in FMD. In summary, we have developed a semiautomated computerized vascular ultrasound analysis system that will improve the power of clinical intervention studies to detect small changes in arterial diameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woodman et al. (2001) studied Healthy volunteers (n=24). Computerized edge-detection and wall-tracking software vs. Traditional manual measurements was evaluated on Intraobserver coefficient of variation of repeated measures of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) (p=<0.05). Computerized edge-detection software significantly lowered the intraobserver coefficient of variation for flow-mediated dilation compared to traditional manual measurements (6.7% vs 24.8%, P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: