PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2006American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics53 citationsOpen Access

Validation of population‐based ADHD subtypes and identification of three clinically impaired subtypes

View Full Paper
HVHeather E. VolkCHCynthia A. HendersonRNRosalind J. Neuman

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Statistically based classification methods have successfully refined ADHD into homogenous and heritable subtypes. External validity and impairment of these subtypes was examined using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). We compared mean CBCL syndrome and competency t-scores across ADHD subtypes defined by latent class analysis in a sample of 1,346 individual twins from Missouri. The potential for comorbidity with conduct disorder (CD), oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), or major depression (MD) to increase impairment in specific ADHD subtypes was also examined. CBCL profiles confirm differences in severity, with more severe classes having increased syndrome scale and decreased competency scale CBCL scores. Clinically significant impairment was found for severe inattentive and combined subtypes and the mild combined subtype. Overall, the presence of comorbid CD, ODD, or MD did not result in increased ADHD subtype impairment. CBCL scores distinguish impairment in ADHD subtypes created through LCA. Comorbidity with CD, ODD, or MD does not significantly increase impairment among ADHD subtypes. The mild combined ADHD subtype represents a clinically significant but under-studied form of ADHD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Volk et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1109aea3e9d485de16846ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper