Key result
Regional TAVR utilization varies across California but shows similar 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has been widely adopted for aortic stenosis, but regional access to and outcomes following TAVR in California required examination.
Are there regional variations in the utilization and outcomes of TAVR in California?
Observational
Yes
Are there regional variations in the utilization and outcomes of TAVR in California?
Despite regional disparities in TAVR access across California, risk-adjusted 30-day clinical outcomes remain similar across regions.
Regional TAVR access disparities in California did not impact 30-day mortality; leaves open whether expanding access reduces MACCE or improves equity.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been widely adopted for management of aortic stenosis. The purpose of this study was to examine regional access to and outcomes following TAVR in California. METHODS: Patients undergoing TAVR or isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) from 2008 to 2019 in California were identified in the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database. California was divided into seven regions: Northern California, San Francisco Bay Area, Central California, Los Angeles, Inland Empire, Orange, and San Diego. Regional TAVR volumes were normalized to Medicare beneficiaries or isolated SAVR volume. Outcomes included risk-adjusted 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE). Trends were studied using non-parametric tests, and regional outcomes using logistic regression. RESULTS: TAVR volume increased annually since 2011, with 7148 cases performed in California in 2019. After normalization, variation in utilization of TAVR was evident, with the least performed in Central California. TAVR to SAVR ratios in 2019 were greatest in Northern California, Los Angeles, and San Diego, and least in the Inland Empire. After risk adjustment, there were no significant regional differences in 30-day mortality, but lower 30-day MACCE in the San Francisco Bay Area. CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in TAVR utilization exist, with limited access in Central California and the Inland Empire, but risk-adjusted outcomes are similar. Efforts to reach underserved areas through existing program expansion or regional referrals may distribute transcatheter technology more equitably across California.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hadaya et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated on Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE). Transcatheter aortic valve replacement utilization varied across California regions (7,148 cases in 2019), with limited access in Central California, though 30-day mortality was similar.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: