PURPOSE: To assess whether visual impairment at baseline is an independent contributor to subsequent nursing home placement during a 6-year follow-up. METHODS: 3654 non-institutionalised people aged 49+ years (82.4% of those eligible) who participated in baseline examinations of the Blue Mountains Eye Study (1992-94) were followed during 1997-99. Presenting visual acuity was measured with current glasses and a standardised refraction performed. We defined visual impairment as visual acuity reduced to <or=20/40. Permanent nursing home admissions during follow-up were confirmed by the regional Aged Care Assessment Team and government subsidy payment records. RESULTS: At baseline, 511 participants had presenting visual impairment. After refraction, vision improved to 20/30 or better in 346 persons (68%, "correctable"), while 165 (32%) remained visually impaired. During follow-up, 162 study participants (5.0%) were admitted permanently to a nursing home. The age-adjusted 6-year incidence was 3.6% for participants with normal vision, 16.2% for those with visual impairment after best correction and 8.1% for those with "correctable" visual impairment. After adjusting for non-cognitive factors that predicted nursing home placement, the relative risk (RR) for nursing home admission among persons with visual impairment after best correction was 1.8 (95% CI 1.1-2.9). A similar magnitude of association was found among persons with "correctable" visual impairment (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.1). For each line of reduction in presenting visual acuity at baseline, there was a 7% increased risk of subsequent nursing home placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that decreased vision may be a marker or contributing factor to subsequent nursing home placement in general older populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: