Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modernization, contrary to the common assumption of most writings in the field, does not follow a uniform path. The diversity of the historical experiences in the Third World countries imposes a severe revision of the theory. The case of India is taken as a good example. It helps the author to declare that there are two theorical lines which must be at the same time divided and connected. The first is functionalist, the second sequentiel, including contradictions and break thoughts. A last section is devoted to the necessity of reflexivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudipta Kaviraj (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: