This paper reopens the question of whether two distinct phrasal categories are truly necessary. Is a model of prosodic parsing possible that accounts for all the facts, both in Japanese and in other languages, with a single phonological phrase category? We will argue that such a conception is not only possible, but in fact necessary: multiple categories create problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itô et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: