Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Economic modeling demonstrates reduced costs and increased quality-adjusted survival for mobile health support in urban minority populations, highlighting high long-term value.
PURPOSE: Type 2 diabetes imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems. Interdisciplinary healthcare teams can offer patient-centered care by integrating medical, behavioral, and social support services. This approach has the potential to lower complication rates while reducing healthcare expenditures. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based clinical pharmacist and community health worker team-based mobile health intervention for diabetes adherence support (mDAS), compared to usual care, among urban African American and Latinx individuals with elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). METHODS: Direct medical costs from a health system perspective and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared between the intervention and usual care groups, using a Markov state transition model to simulate the occurrence of cardiovascular and renal complications. Model inputs were derived from published literature and electronic health records. Comprehensive sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of model findings. RESULTS: Compared to usual care, the mDAS intervention resulted in higher QALYs and lower costs over 5-year, 10-year, and lifetime horizons. Incremental QALYs and cost savings were 0.01, 0.03, and 0.17 and $695, $2,393, and $6,829, respectively. Benefits were more pronounced with longer time horizons. Sensitivity analyses indicated that while the magnitude of cost savings diminished as the risk of complications decreased, the intervention consistently resulted in lower costs and higher QALYs. CONCLUSION: The mDAS intervention resulted in cost savings and long-term health benefits, indicating its potential value for policymakers, healthcare systems, and insurers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: