Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A current paradigm states that non-antigen-specific inflammatory cues attract noncognate, bystander T cell specificities to sites of infection and autoimmune inflammation. Here we show that cues emanating from a tissue undergoing spontaneous autoimmune inflammation cannot recruit naive or activated bystander T cell specificities in the absence of local expression of cognate antigen. We monitored the recruitment of CD8(+) T cells specific for the prevalent diabetogenic epitope islet-specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit-related protein (IGRP)(206-214) in gene-targeted nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice expressing a T cell "invisible" IGRP(206-214) sequence. These mice developed islet inflammation and diabetes with normal incidence and kinetics, but their inflammatory lesions could recruit neither naive (endogenous or exogenous) nor ex vivo-activated IGRP(206-214)-reactive CD8(+) T cells. Conversely, IGRP(206-214)-reactive, but not nonautoreactive CD8(+) T cells rapidly homed to and accumulated in the inflamed islets of wild-type NOD mice. Our results indicate that CD8(+) T cell recruitment to a site of autoimmune inflammation results from an active process that is strictly dependent on local display of cognate pMHC and suggest that CD8(+) T cells contained in extralymphoid autoimmune lesions are largely autoreactive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: