Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Centanafadine (CTN) is a first-in-class norepinephrine, dopamine, serotonin reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CTN vs placebo in children with ADHD. METHODS Children aged 6 to 12 years (inclusive) with a primary diagnosis of ADHD were randomized to weight-based low-dose CTN, weight-based high-dose CTN, or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the ADHD Rating Scale, version 5 (ADHD-RS-5) symptoms total raw score at week 6. RESULTS Of 480 participants randomized (low-dose CTN, n = 154; high-dose CTN, n = 162; placebo, n = 164), 457 received at least 1 dose of study drug and 367 (76%) completed the trial. At week 6, improvements in ADHD-RS-5 symptoms total raw score were significantly greater with high-dose CTN than with placebo (–16.3 [1.2] vs –10.8 [1.2], P < .001). High-dose CTN showed separation from placebo as early as week 1, the first postbaseline time point, with the effect maintained throughout the study period. Low-dose CTN did not show statistical significance in the primary endpoint. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 52/147 (35%) participants in the low-dose CTN group, 61/157 (39%) in the high-dose CTN group, and 39/153 (25%) in the placebo group. The most common TEAEs were decreased appetite (23/457 [5%]), rash (14/457 [3%]), and vomiting (13/457 [3%]). All TEAEs were of mild or moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS High-dose CTN was efficacious for treatment of ADHD in children. Both CTN doses were safe and well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ward et al. (2025) studied this question.