Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates a standardized reproducibility protocol for microphysiological systems, indicating improved differentiation between technical variability and biological heterogeneity.
Multi-cell-type, 3D microphysiological systems (MPS) that recapitulate normal organ/organ system functions and the progression of diseases are being applied in drug discovery and development programs to enable precision medicine. A critical step for this application is to demonstrate the reproducibility of the MPS and its ability to identify biologic/clinical heterogeneity from experimental variability, which requires capturing detailed metadata associated with MPS studies as well as a strong analytical approach for assessing reproducibility. Detailed metadata ensure that identical study parameters are being compared when evaluating reproducibility. We have developed the Pittsburgh reproducibility protocol (PReP), which uses a set of common statistical metrics, the coefficient of variation (CV), ANOVA, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), in a pipeline as a standard approach to evaluate the intra- and interstudy reproducibility of MPS performance. The PReP can be employed to identify biological/clinical heterogeneity relevant to precision medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miedel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: