This article examines 'fire and rehire' practices in the Employment Rights Act 2025, addressing regulatory challenges and implications.
This article considers the controversial topic of ‘fire and rehire’ and the regulatory choices in the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA). We argue that ‘fire and rehire’ is a practice that responds to the challenges posed by relational contracts: how should legislators balance flexibility and stability of contractual obligations when changing economic circumstances render performance more onerous for one of the contracting parties? The article then analyses the complex provisions dealing with ‘fire and rehire’ in the ERA, identifying likely interpretive problems and proposing solutions. Overall, we think that ‘fire and rehire’ regulation in ERA is based upon a compelling normative foundation. The unresolved issue is whether the restrictions on contractual flexibility will be excessive for employers, and if so whether this will lead to negative economic consequences in terms of redundancies, insolvency, or reduced employment opportunities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bogg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: