Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wiki users receive very little guidance on the trustworthiness of the information they find. It is difficult for them to determine how long the text in a page has existed, or who originally authored the text. It is also difficult to assess the reliability of authors contributing to a wiki page. In this paper, we create a set of trust indicators and metrics derived from phrasal analysis of the article revision history. These metrics include author attribution, author reputation, expertise ratings, article evolution, and text trustworthiness. We also propose a new technique for collecting and maintaining explicit article ratings across multiple revisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krámer et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: