Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates RAI avidity across histological types in non-papillary thyroid carcinoma, suggesting potential treatment pathways.
Purpose The detailed studies considering the distinct types of non-papillary follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma in terms of radioactive iodine (RAI) avidity are limited. This study aimed to investigate clinicopathological characteristics, relationship between histopathological findings including solid/trabecular/insular (STI) components and RAI treatment (RAIT) in patients with non-papillary follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma. Methods This study included 114 patients with non-papillary follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma who underwent first RAIT between January 2005 and August 2025. Results Of the 114 patients, 5 (4%) were minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (MI-FTC), 41 (36%) were encapsulated angio-invasive FTC (EA-FTC), 23 (20%) were widely invasive FTC (WI-FTC), 22 (19%) were differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma (DHGTC), 21 (18%) were poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC), and 2 (2%) were others, respectively. The median percentages of STI component was 40% (range, 0–10%) in all patients, 5% (range, 0–50%) in MI-FTC, 30% (range, 0–100%) in EA-FTC, 30% (range, 0–100%) in WI-FTC, 28% (range, 5–70%) in DHGTC, and 70% (range, 50–100%) in PDTC, respectively. Among the 114 patients, the rate of RAI avidity was 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49–71%) (47/78) in lung, 89% (95% CI, 79–96%) (59/66) was in bone, 100% (13/13) in lymph node, and 100% (3/3) in other sites, respectively. Conclusions RAI avidity was relatively high in non-papillary follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma, regardless of the histological type and percentage of STI components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamazaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: