This dialogue critiques methodological nationalism in global media studies, suggesting a new analytical framework for understanding communications.
In this dialogue, Terhi Rantanen traces her intellectual trajectory from early disillusionment with quantitative content analysis through institutional histories of news agencies to the sociology of knowledge in Dead Men’s Propaganda . Drawing on four decades of comparative communications studies, she elaborates a critique of “methodological inter-nationalism” and advances methodological cosmopolitanism by taking cities and transnational flows as primary units of analysis. Rantanen examines how archives operate as power-shaped spaces, deploys Mannheim’s ideology-utopia dialectic to illuminate knowledge production dilemmas among the “forefront generation,” and develops mediagraphy as a biographical method for studying globalisation from below. She further reflects on how gendered and migratory locations reshape visibility in comparative communications, and considers the contemporary relevance of propaganda research amid resurgent geopolitical tensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rantanen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: