There is no question that Kling is one of the foremost pioneers in exploring the dimensions of computing. For twenty years, he and his colleagues have insisted that the study of computing must extend well beyond the technical design of computers. Starting with a concern for the of computers on society, Kling and his colleagues have begun to explore various perspectives for revealing the dimensions of computer systems. This trend happily coincides with a rejuvenation of the sociology of technology, which in recent years has taken on board some of the relativistconstructivist currents in the sociology of scientific knowledge. Although the focus on computing technology is as yet the interest of a minority, the new sociology of technology offers some attractive options for the development of theoretical frameworks that might further spur advances in perspectives on computing. It is therefore interesting to consider the possibilities of synergy between the awareness of the of computing that emerges from within computing sciences (as exemplified by Kling and his colleagues) and the work of scientists who bring to bear theoretical frameworks worked out in relation to science and technology more generally. In particular, we feel it important to examine what happens to traditional arguments about the impact of technology when the more virulent arguments from relativismconstructivism are brought to bear. Crucial in this regard is a consideration of what exactly the social dimension of computing comprises. Kling's
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woolgar et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: