A study of the naming patterns used for 648 children in 322 American families provided mixed support for a number of hypotheses that are derived from the propositions that namesaking (the naming of a child after another person) functions as advertisement of genetic kinship when it may be in doubt and as a strategy to procure future investment of resources from the father and other relatives. Males and second‐born children with older sisters were more likely to be namesaked, and birth order was a significant predictor of the probability of being namesaked for males. First‐borns were more likely to be named after a patrilineal relative, but there was no tendency for children born early in a marriage to be namesaked more frequently than children born after many years of marriage. Parents who themselves were namesaked were more likely to namesake their own children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McAndrew et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: