This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: To develop a method for differentiating malignant from benign clustered microcalcifications in which image features are both extracted and analyzed by a computer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred mammograms from 53 patients who had undergone biopsy for suspicious clustered microcalcifications were analyzed by a computer. Eight computer-extracted features of clustered microcalcifications were merged by an artificial neural network. Human input was limited to initial identification of the microcalcifications. RESULTS: Computer analysis allowed identification of 100% of the patients with breast cancer and 82% of the patients with benign conditions. The accuracy of computer analysis was statistically significantly better than that of five radiologists (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Quantitative features can be extracted and analyzed by a computer to distinguish malignant from benign clustered microcalcifications. This technique may help radiologists reduce the number of false-positive biopsy findings.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: