We investigate the transition probability rate of a Unruh-DeWitt (UD) detector interacting with massless scalar field for a finite duration of proper time, T, of the detector. For a UD detector moving at a uniform acceleration, a, we explicitly show that the finite-time transition probability rate can be written as a sum of purely thermal terms, and non-thermal transient terms. While the thermal terms are independent of time, T, the non-thermal transient terms depend on $(ΔET)$, $(aT)$, and $(ΔE/a)$, where $ΔE$ is the energy gap of the detector. Particularly, the non-thermal terms are oscillatory with respect to the variable $(ΔET)$, so that they may be averaged out to be insignificant in the limit ΔET 1, irrespective of the values of $(aT)$ and $(ΔE/a)$. To quantify the contribution of non-thermal transient terms to the transition probability rate of a uniformly accelerating detector, we introduce a parameter, εₙₜ, called non-thermal parameter. Demanding the contribution of non-thermal terms in the finite-time transition probability rate to be negligibly small, , εₙₜ=δ1, we calculate the thermalization time -- the time required for the detector to interact with the field to arrive at the required non-thermality, εₙₜ=δ, and the detector to be (almost) thermalized with the Unruh bath in its comoving frame. Specifically, for small accelerations, aΔE, we find the thermalization time, τₜₕ, to be τₜₕ ~ (ΔE)⁻¹ × e2π|ΔE|/a/δ; and for large accelerations, a ΔE, we find the thermalization time to be τₜₕ ~ (ΔE)⁻¹/δ. We comment on the possibilities of bringing down the exponentially large thermalization time at small accelerations, aΔE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. Jaffino Stargen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: