Prognostic scoring systems for heart failure are predominantly based on outpatient or recently hospitalized populations, leaving a critical gap in prognostication for advanced heart failure.
Are prognostic scoring systems useful for risk stratification and decision-making in advanced heart failure?
There is a need for better prognostic scores specifically designed for advanced heart failure to aid in critical decisions such as heart transplantation and end-of-life care.
Advanced heart failure (HF) is becoming an increasingly challenging problem as more patients with this disease are living longer, yet experiencing its inexorable progression. Adding to this complex matter, there are different views on how to define advanced HF, whereby an acute decompensation episode does not necessarily indicate advanced disease. Several scores have been described aiming at a better prognostic performance across the HF spectrum. These include the Heart Failure Survival Score, the Seattle Heart Failure Model, the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure predictive schemes, the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry regression tree discrimination, among others. Most scoring systems have been built based on outpatient populations or recently hospitalized HF subjects. The setting of advanced HF has not gained much attention as far as prognostication is concerned, and yet there lies potentially challenging decision-making situations where issues, such as heart transplantation, use of costly devices and end-of-life questions, are raised.
Goldraich et al. (Sat,) conducted a review in Advanced heart failure. Prognostic scoring systems was evaluated. Prognostic scoring systems for heart failure are predominantly based on outpatient or recently hospitalized populations, leaving a critical gap in prognostication for advanced heart failure.