Key result
Robotic colorectal surgery with ERAS linked to ~4.5 fewer hospital days versus conventional laparoscopy.
Why the study?
This study evaluated the learning curve and surgical outcomes of robotic assisted colorectal surgery combined with an ERAS program to serve as a reference for future surgeons.
Does robotic assisted colorectal surgery with an ERAS program improve surgical outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery?
Case-Control (n=290)
No
Does robotic assisted colorectal surgery with an ERAS program improve surgical outcomes compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery?
Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery with an ERAS program requires a learning curve of about 31 cases but leads to significantly faster recovery and shorter hospital stays compared to conventional laparoscopy.
Shorter hospital stays associated with robotic colorectal ERAS; leaves open randomized confirmation of net benefit.
This study analyzed learning curve and the surgical outcome of robotic assisted colorectal surgery with ERAS program. The study results serve as a reference for future robotic colorectal surgeon who applied ERAS in clinical practice. This was a retrospective case-control study to analyze the learning curve of 141 robotic assisted colorectal surgery (RAS) by Da Vinci Xi (Xi) system and compare the surgical outcomes with 147 conventional laparoscopic (LSC) surgery in the same team. Evaluation for maturation was performed by operation time and the CUSUM plot. Patients were recruited from 1st February 2019 to 9th January 2022; follow-up was conducted at 30 days, and the final follow-up was conducted on 9th February 2022. It both took 31 cases for colon and rectal robotic surgeries to reach the maturation phase. Teamwork maturation was achieved after 60 cases. In the maturation stage, RAS required a longer operation time (mean: colon: 249.5 ± 46.5 vs. 190.3 ± 57.3 p < 0.001; rectum 314.9 ± 59.6 vs. 223.6 ± 63.5 p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, robotic surgery with ERAS program resulted in significant shorter length of hospital stay (mean: colon: 5.5 ± 4.5 vs. 10.0 ± 11.9, p < 0.001; rectum: 5.4 ± 3.5 vs. 10.1 ± 7.0, p < 0.001), lower minor complication rate (colon: 6.0% vs 20.0%, p = 0.074 ; rectum: 11.1% vs 33.3%, p = 0.102), and no significant different major complication rate (colon: 2.0% vs 6.0%, p = 0.617; rectum: 7.4% cs 7.4%, p = 1.0) to conventional LSC. Learning curve for robotic assisted colorectal surgery takes 31 cases. Robotic surgery with ERAS program brings significant faster recovery and fewer complication rate compared to laparoscopy in colorectal surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Colorectal surgery (n=290). Robotic assisted colorectal surgery (RAS) with ERAS program vs. Conventional laparoscopic (LSC) surgery was evaluated on Length of hospital stay for colon surgery (days) (p=<0.001). Robotic assisted colorectal surgery with an ERAS program significantly reduced the length of hospital stay compared to conventional laparoscopy, with the surgical learning curve requiring 31 cases to reach maturation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: