Why the study?
Is non-invasive Doppler ultrasound a reproducible method for measuring aortic compliance?
Is non-invasive Doppler ultrasound a reproducible method for measuring aortic compliance?
Non-invasive Doppler ultrasound provides a reproducible method for measuring aortic compliance over 1 to 3 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports reproducibility of non-invasive Doppler ultrasound for aortic compliance; leaves open larger validation before clinical adoption.
Aortic compliance (expressed as percentage increase in lumen diameter for a pulse pressure of 10 mmHg) was calculated from the characteristic pulse wave velocity deduced from 'foot to foot' transit times of the blood flow pulse over a measured length of aorta. Two continuous wave Doppler ultrasound transducers were used: one insonating the root of the left subclavian artery, the other the abdominal aorta proximal to its bifurcation. Measurements were made after the subject had been supine for 5 min to achieve stable conditions. 2. Transit times were calculated on-line in real-time from the delay between the start of the systolic upstroke in the flow velocity sonograms recorded by the two transducers. 3. Within-visit variation was minimized by measuring over 45 cardiac cycles repeated three separate times and calculating an overall mean value for aortic compliance. A full measurement took 5-10 min. 4. Reproducibility of this overall mean value of aortic compliance was assessed at 1 month in 30 subjects (aged 60 +/- 7 years, mean +/- SD) and at 3 months in 23 different subjects (59 +/- 8 years). Aortic compliance values ranged from 0.1 to 2.0%/10 mmHg. 5. The mean paired difference between aortic compliance values was -0.02 between 0 and 1 months, and 0.03 between 0 and 3 months, with respective 95% confidence limits of -0.06 to 0.03 and -0.03 to 0.09 embracing zero, thus not differing significantly from baseline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: