A method for estimating the best set of parameters for multiobjective hydrologic models was developed. The method of Multiple Objective Programming (MOP) and a method based on Bayesian statistical theory were used to construct objective functions and to carry out the optimization procedures. A hydrological model called PRMS (Leavesley et al., 1983) was used. Three objectives and four parameters were considered. The results show that when a single objective function is used, the optimal parameters are good with respect to the optimized objective but may be poor in terms of other objectives. When a multiple objective function is used, the optimized parameters are relatively good with respect to all objectives
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: