This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this paper, we provide a systematic procedure for designing cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) systems that are robust to parasitic actuation lag in braking and propulsion and delay in the communicated acceleration from the predecessor vehicle. In particular, we derive a tight lower bound on the employable time headway in CACC systems for guaranteeing robust string stability. The lower bound on the time headway is dependent on the upper bound on the parasitic actuation lag (τ0) and the communication delay (ℓ). The main result of the paper is that if τ0 exceeds ℓ, then the employable time headway is lower bounded by τ0+ℓ. Otherwise, it is better to use adaptive cruise control (ACC) where the employable time headway is lower bounded by 2τ0. The above results on CACC systems are then extended to next-generation CACC (CACC+) systems that employ information from multiple predecessor vehicles. Several comparative numerical simulations for a representative maneuver corroborate the main results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: