Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper is a study of the apparent intractability of problems in decentralized decision-making, using the concepts and methods of Complexity Theory. We first establish that the discrete version of an important paradigm for this area, proposed by Witsenhausen, is NP-complete, thus explaining the failures reported in the literature to attack it computationally. In the rest of the paper we show that the computational intractability of the discrete version of a control problem can imply that there are no satisfactory (continuous) algorithms for the continuous version. To this effect, we develop a theory of continuous algorithms and their complexity, and an analytical methodology, which can prove quite interesting by themselves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papadimitriou et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 6 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: