Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Dec 1943Benign Hypertrophy of the Prostate. A Morphological Study1 Robert A. Moore Robert A. MooreRobert A. Moore The greater part of the material for this investigation was collected while serving as a National Research Council Fellow under Prof. J. Erdheim in Vienna. Assistance in the preparation of the slides was furnished by a grant from the Committee on Grants-in-Aid of the National Research Council. Experimental investigations not reported here but based on the morphological studies have been supported by the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation, the Roger and Gladys Straus Foundation and the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. These exprimental studies have yielded material information bearing on the interpretation of the morphological changes. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)70503-4AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail © 1943 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byGRAYHACK J, KOZLOWSKI J and LEE C (2018) THE PATHOGENESIS OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA: A PROPOSED HYPOTHESIS AND CRITICAL EVALUATIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 6 Part 2, (2375-2380), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998.Story M, Sasse J, Kakuska D, Jacobs S and Lawson R (2018) A Growth Factor in Bovine and Human Testes Structurally Related to Basic Fibroblast Growth FactorJournal of Urology, VOL. 140, NO. 2, (422-427), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1988.Ahmann F, Woo L, Guevara A and Nagle R (2018) The Growth of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy in Semisolid Agar CultureJournal of Urology, VOL. 136, NO. 1 Part 1, (154-157), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1986.Berry S, Coffey D, Walsh P and Ewing L (2018) The Development of Human Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with AgeJournal of Urology, VOL. 132, NO. 3, (474-479), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1984.Story M, Jacobs S and Lawson R (2018) Epidermal Growth Factor is not the Major Growth-Promoting Agent in Extracts of Prostatic TissueJournal of Urology, VOL. 130, NO. 1, (175-179), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1983.Mariotti A and Mawhinney M (2018) The Hormonal Maintenance and Restoration of Guinea Pig Seminal Vesicle Fibromuscular StromaJournal of Urology, VOL. 128, NO. 4, (852-857), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1982.Mariotti A, Donovan M and Mawhinney M (2018) Collagen and Cellular Proliferation in Spontaneous Canine Benign Prostatic HypertrophyJournal of Urology, VOL. 127, NO. 4, (795-797), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1982.Bartsch G, Müller H, Oberholzer M and Rohr H (2018) Light Microscopic Stereological Analysis of the Normal Human Prostate and of Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Urology, VOL. 122, NO. 4, (487-491), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1979.Pradhan B and Chandra K (2018) Morphogenesis of Nodular Hyperplasia—ProstateJournal of Urology, VOL. 113, NO. 2, (210-213), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1975.Mcneal J (2018) The Prostate and Prostatic Urethra: A Morphologic SynthesisJournal of Urology, VOL. 107, NO. 6, (1008-1016), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1972.Ahluwalia M and Tandon H (2018) Nodular Hyperplasia of the Prostate in North India: An Autopsy StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 93, NO. 1, (94-101), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1965.Fox M (2018) The Natural History and Significance of Stone Formation in the Prostate GlandJournal of Urology, VOL. 89, NO. 5, (716-727), Online publication date: 1-May-1963.Grayhack J (2018) Changes with Aging in Human Seminal Vesicle Fluid Fructose Concentration and Seminal Vesicle WeightJournal of Urology, VOL. 86, NO. 1, (142-148), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1961.Norris R, Martens V and O’Gara R (2018) The Resemblance of Hypertrophy of the Prostate to Congenital Polycystic Disease. Reconstruction of Cystic Lesions of Hypertrophied Prostate in Three CasesJournal of Urology, VOL. 76, NO. 3, (276-286), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1956.Abeshouse B and Ruben M (2018) Prostatic and Periprostatic PhlebographyJournal of Urology, VOL. 68, NO. 3, (640-646), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1952.Labess M (2018) Occult Carcinoma in Clinically Benign Hypertrophy of the Prostate: A Pathological and Clinical StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 68, NO. 6, (893-896), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1952.Rezek P, Coplan M, Woods F and Melvin P (2018) Histological Studies of Carcinoma of the Prostate Treated by EstrogenJournal of Urology, VOL. 66, NO. 3, (379-389), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1951.Baker W and Carney J (2018) Squamous Cell Carcinoma of ProstateJournal of Urology, VOL. 64, NO. 6, (752-757), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1950.Roth R (2018) Prostatic InfarctionJournal of Urology, VOL. 62, NO. 4, (474-479), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1949.Carroll G (2018) The Problem of the Prostate GlandJournal of Urology, VOL. 57, NO. 1, (42-48), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1947. Volume 50Issue 6December 1943Page: 680-710 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1943 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Robert A. Moore The greater part of the material for this investigation was collected while serving as a National Research Council Fellow under Prof. J. Erdheim in Vienna. Assistance in the preparation of the slides was furnished by a grant from the Committee on Grants-in-Aid of the National Research Council. Experimental investigations not reported here but based on the morphological studies have been supported by the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation, the Roger and Gladys Straus Foundation and the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation. These exprimental studies have yielded material information bearing on the interpretation of the morphological changes. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert A. Moore (1943) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: