Private primary health care centres offered fewer dieticians for cardiac rehabilitation compared to public centres (32% vs. 73%; p=0.03), highlighting a general lack of resources for CHD patients.
Cross-Sectional (n=91)
Yes
What are the primary health care resources for rehabilitation and secondary prevention after myocardial infarction in a southern Swedish region?
Primary health care centers in southern Sweden lack adequate resources, specialized staff training, and long-term care strategies for secondary prevention and rehabilitation of coronary heart disease patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 32% vs 73%
p-value: p=0.03
BACKGROUND: During the first year after a cardiac event, many patients are offered participation in a cardiac rehabilitation programme, after which the patients are often not given the opportunity to continue to attend rehabilitation and secondary prevention programmes. AIM: This study describes the primary health care centres' (PHCC) resources regarding cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients in a southern Swedish region. METHOD: A questionnaire containing 26 dichotomous or multiple choice questions was sent to the responsible manager of all 137 public and private PHCCs in Region Skåne. Questionnaires from 91 (66%) of the PHCCs were completed and returned. RESULT: Few nurses at the PHCCs had special training regarding CHD (10%), cardiac rehabilitation (8%) or heart failure (32%). Twenty-one per cent of the physicians had special training regarding CHD. One third of the PHCCs did not offer long-term secondary prevention programmes, and few (6%) had any routines for offering socio-economic support to CHD patients. Comparison of private and public PHCCs showed that the private centres could not offer a physiotherapist (61 vs. 84%) or dietician (32 vs. 73%; p = 0.03) to the same extension as the public ones. Furthermore, the majority (91%) of PHCCs had no cooperation with patient organizations. CONCLUSIONS: The PHCCs need to improve the strategies and long-term rehabilitation programmes. Furthermore, they need to focus on education programme for the staff. The result revealed that the PHCCs lack resources, strategies and long-term care programmes for CHD patients.
Sjöström‐Strand et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (n=91). Private primary health care centres vs. Public primary health care centres was evaluated on Availability of a dietician (p=0.03). Private primary health care centres offered fewer dieticians for cardiac rehabilitation compared to public centres (32% vs. 73%; p=0.03), highlighting a general lack of resources for CHD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: