PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 8, 2024European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes17 citationsOpen Access

Loss of quality of life and increased societal costs in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the AFFECT-HCM study

View Full Paper
SSStephan A C SchoonveldeIWIsabell WiethoffPZPeter-Paul Zwetsloot

Key Result

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with reduced quality of life (KCCQ: 88 vs 98; P<0.001) and higher societal costs (€19,035 vs €7,385/year) compared to G+/P- subjects.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=506)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does hypertrophic cardiomyopathy reduce quality of life and increase societal costs compared to genotype-positive phenotype-negative subjects?

P
Population
506 subjects from three Dutch hospitals, including genotyped HCM patients and genotype-positive phenotype-negative (G+/P-) subjects (84 G+/P-, 313 nHCM, 109 oHCM; median age 59 years, 39% female).
I
Intervention
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (non-obstructive [nHCM] and obstructive [oHCM])
C
Comparator
Genotype-positive phenotype-negative (G+/P-) subjects
O
Outcome
Quality of life (assessed with EQ-5D-5L and KCCQ) and societal costs (medical consumption and productivity cost)patient reported

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is associated with significantly decreased quality of life and increased societal costs compared to genotype-positive phenotype-negative individuals, particularly in younger and symptomatic patients.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 98%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most prevalent inherited cardiac disease. The impact of HCM on quality of life (QoL) and societal costs remains poorly understood. This prospective multi-centre burden of disease study estimated QoL and societal costs of genotyped HCM patients and genotype-positive phenotype-negative (G+/P-) subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants were categorized into three groups based on genotype and phenotype: (i) G+/P- left ventricular (LV) wall thickness <13 mm, (ii) non-obstructive HCM nHCM, LV outflow tract (LVOT) gradient <30 mmHg, and (iii) obstructive HCM (oHCM, LVOT gradient ≥30 mmHg). We assessed QoL with EQ-5D-5L and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires (KCCQ). Societal costs were measured using medical consumption (Medical Consumption Questionnaire) and productivity cost (iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire) questionnaires. We performed subanalyses within three age groups: <40, 40-59, and ≥60 years. From three Dutch hospitals, 506 subjects were enrolled (84 G+/P-, 313 nHCM, 109 oHCM; median age 59 years, 39% female). HCM (both nHCM and oHCM) patients reported reduced QoL vs. G+/P- subjects (KCCQ: 88 vs. 98, EQ-5D-5L: 0.88 vs. 0.96; both P < 0.001). oHCM patients reported lower KCCQ scores than nHCM patients (83 vs. 89, P = 0.036). Societal costs were significantly higher in HCM patients (€19,035/year vs. €7385/year) compared with G+/P- controls, mainly explained by higher healthcare costs and productivity losses. Being symptomatic and of younger age (<60 years) particularly led to decreased QoL and increased costs. CONCLUSION: HCM is associated with decreased QoL and increased societal costs, especially in younger and symptomatic patients. oHCM patients were more frequently symptomatic than nHCM patients. This study highlights the substantial disease burden of HCM and can aid in assessing new therapy cost-effectiveness for HCM in the future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schoonvelde et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=506). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) vs. Genotype-positive phenotype-negative (G+/P-) subjects was evaluated on Quality of life (KCCQ score) (p=<0.001). Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with reduced quality of life (KCCQ: 88 vs 98; P<0.001) and higher societal costs (€19,035 vs €7,385/year) compared to G+/P- subjects.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11d43e8b61bd91eb5644e2https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae092
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper