Key result
Occult obstructive HCM shows ~44% lower LA circumferential conduit strain versus nonobstructive patients.
Why the study?
To describe the different components of left atrial dysfunction predictors in nonobstructive and occult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with preserved LV ejection fraction using 4D longitudinal and circumferential strains.
Does 4D volume-strain echocardiography differentiate left atrial performance between nonobstructive and occult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=96)
Blinded analysis
No
Does 4D volume-strain echocardiography differentiate left atrial performance between nonobstructive and occult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
4D volume-strain echocardiography can detect subtle left atrial dysfunction and differentiate between nonobstructive and occult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the different components of left atrial (LA) dysfunction predictors in nonobstructive and occult obstructive hypertrophy cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients especially with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, particularly using LA 4-dimensional (D) longitudinal and circumferential strains. METHODS: Twenty-eight nonobstructive HCM patients and 30 occult obstructive HCM patients according to LV outflow tract gradient at rest and after exercise were prospectively enrolled. 4D echocardiographic evaluation was performed in 58 HCM patients, both nonobstructive and occult obstructive, and 38 control subjects. LA reservoir, conduit, contractile functions were performed by 4D volume-strain with volumes and longitudinal, circumferential strains. RESULTS: Optimal correlation coefficients obtained between LV 4D mass (index) and LA 4D longitudinal/circumferential strain (r=-0.860 to 0.518, all P<0.001). Both nonobstructive and occult obstructive HCM patients had increased volumes and significantly decreased longitudinal, circumferential strain values with lower reservoir, conduit, contractile functions than the controls (all P<0.001). Occult obstructive HCM patients presented incremented volumes compared with nonobstructive ones (P<0.001 to 0.003). Lower conduit function and higher contractile function indicated with lower reservoir function revealed by circumferential strain in occult obstructive HCM patients than nonobstructive ones (P<0.001 to 0.017). Interclass correlation coefficients of intraobserver and interobserver in the LV and LA 4D value evaluations were >0.75 and >0.85, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LA volumes were significantly increased and LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile functions were significantly impaired in HCM patients. Furthermore, different performances of LA functional analyses in nonobstruction and occult obstruction patients with 4D volume-strain echocardiography may facilitate the recognition of subtle LA dysfunctional differentiation in HCM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ran et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (n=96). Occult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy vs. Nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Left atrial peak circumferential strain of conduit function (LAScd-c) (p=<0.001). Occult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients demonstrated significantly impaired left atrial circumferential strain of conduit function (-7.60% vs -13.64%, P<0.001) compared to nonobstructive patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: