Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort study reveals altered EEG connectivity and microstates predict seizure recurrence in new-onset epilepsy, indicating their value as early biomarkers of treatment response.
PURPOSE: Antiseizure medication is the first-line treatment for new-onset-epilepsy, leading to seizure control in 70% to 80% of patients. An early identification of an appropriate treatment is extremely important to avoid seizure relapses, and biomarkers for relapse risk are needed to avoid any delays. The authors investigated electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain connectivity and microstates between patients with new-onset epilepsy who responded to treatment (SZ-FREE) and patients who relapsed (SZ-REL), to link potential differences to treatment response. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with new-onset epilepsy for whom an EEG was performed before treatment initiation, after a first seizure event. The authors computed EEG connectivity for delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequencies, and microstates. By performing mixed-model analyses, the authors tested connectivity differences across frequency bands and microstate characteristic changes between SZ-FREE and SZ-REL. RESULTS: After treatment, 51 patients remained seizure free while 11 relapsed within 6 months. The authors observed a significant interaction between frequency bands and groups (P < 0.001). Post hoc tests showed delta (P = 0.006) and theta (P = 0.012) decreases, and alpha increases (P < 0.001) for patients with SZ-REL compared with patients with SZ-FREE. Microstate C had a significantly higher global explained variance for patients with SZ-REL than patients with SZ-FREE (P = 0.021), while microstates A occurred more frequently in SZ-REL (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: EEG connectivity and microstates in the first EEG within 24 hours after the initial seizure hold valuable information related to the drug responsiveness in patients with new-onset epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: EEG connectivity and microstates are potential markers of treatment response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ménétré et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: