I recently taught a module on the philosophies of evaluation as part of a pilot introductory course of a new diploma programme jointly sponsored by the United Nations (UN) Evaluation Group and the United Nations Staff College (Russon, 2007, November). In the session, I compared and contrasted the “rationalistic” paradigm with the “naturalistic” paradigm on the basis of ontology, epistemology, and methodology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craig Russon (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: