Deep-learning methods (especially convolutional neural networks) using structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data have been successfully applied to computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its prodromal stage [i.e., mild cognitive impairment (MCI)]. As it is practically challenging to capture local and subtle disease-associated abnormalities directly from the whole-brain sMRI, most of those deep-learning approaches empirically preselect disease-associated sMRI brain regions for model construction. Considering that such isolated selection of potentially informative brain locations might be suboptimal, very few methods have been proposed to perform disease-associated discriminative region localization and disease diagnosis in a unified deep-learning framework. However, those methods based on task-oriented discriminative localization still suffer from two common limitations, that is: 1) identified brain locations are strictly consistent across all subjects, which ignores the unique anatomical characteristics of each brain and 2) only limited local regions/patches are used for model training, which does not fully utilize the global structural information provided by the whole-brain sMRI. In this article, we propose an attention-guided deep-learning framework to extract multilevel discriminative sMRI features for dementia diagnosis. Specifically, we first design a backbone fully convolutional network to automatically localize the discriminative brain regions in a weakly supervised manner. Using the identified disease-related regions as spatial attention guidance, we further develop a hybrid network to jointly learn and fuse multilevel sMRI features for CAD model construction. Our proposed method was evaluated on three public datasets (i.e., ADNI-1, ADNI-2, and AIBL), showing superior performance compared with several state-of-the-art methods in both tasks of AD diagnosis and MCI conversion prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lian et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: