Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 7, 2022Neurosurgery

Targeting Accuracy and Clinical Outcomes of Awake versus Asleep Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The University of California, San Francisco Experience

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ALAnthony T. LeeKHKasey J. HanNNNoah Nichols

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Lee et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11db3571528255b221aabchttps://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002111
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical outcomes following awake and asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease2018 · 100 citations
  2. 2Outcomes of Interventional-MRI Versus Microelectrode Recording-Guided Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation2018 · 51 citations
  3. 3Parkinson’s disease outcomes after intraoperative CT-guided “asleep” deep brain stimulation in the globus pallidus internus2015 · 92 citations
  4. 4Clinical outcomes of globus pallidus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: a comparison of intraoperative MRI– and MER-guided lead placement2020 · 27 citations
  5. 5CT and MRI Image Fusion Error: An Analysis of Co-Registration Error Using Commercially Available Deep Brain Stimulation Surgical Planning Software2021 · 23 citations