Key result
PCE and Framingham models overestimate 10-year cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals despite moderate discrimination.
Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models help identify high-risk individuals, but no studies had evaluated their performance in an Arab population.
Do the 2008 Framingham risk models and 2013 PCE model accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals without baseline CVD?
Cohort (n=1,041)
No
Do the 2008 Framingham risk models and 2013 PCE model accurately predict 10-year cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals without baseline CVD?
Commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction models (Framingham and PCE) overestimate risk and lack accuracy in the UAE national population, highlighting the need for recalibration or population-specific models.
OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models are useful tools for identifying those at high risk of cardiovascular events in a population. No studies have evaluated the performance of such risk models in an Arab population. Therefore, in this study, the accuracy and clinical usefulness of two commonly used Framingham-based risk models and the 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation (PCE) were assessed in a United Arab Emirates (UAE) national population. DESIGN: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at a tertiary care hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. PARTICIPANTS: The study cohort included 1041 UAE nationals aged 30-79 who had no history of CVD at baseline. Patients were followed until 31 December 2019. Eligible patients were grouped into the PCE and the Framingham validation cohorts. EXPOSURE: The 10-year predicted risk for CVD for each patient was calculated using the 2008 Framingham risk model, the 2008 office-based Framingham risk model, and the 2013 PCE model. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: The discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the three models for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk were assessed. RESULTS: In women, the 2013 PCE model showed marginally better discrimination (C-statistic: 0.77) than the 2008 Framingham models (C-statistic: 0.74-0.75), whereas all three models showed moderate discrimination in men (C-statistic: 0.69‒0.70). All three models overestimated CVD risk in both men and women, with higher levels of predicted risk. The 2008 Framingham risk model (high-risk threshold of 20%) classified only 46% of women who subsequently developed incident CVD within 10 years as high risk. The 2013 PCE risk model (high-risk threshold of 7.5%) classified 74% of men who did not develop a cardiovascular event as high risk. CONCLUSIONS: None of the three models is accurate for predicting cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals. The performance of the models could potentially be improved by recalibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Shamsi et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=1,041). 2008 Framingham risk models and 2013 Pooled Cohort Risk Equation was evaluated on Discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness for predicting 10-year cardiovascular risk. The 2013 Pooled Cohort Equation and 2008 Framingham risk models overestimated 10-year cardiovascular risk in UAE nationals, with moderate discrimination (C-statistics 0.69-0.77).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: