Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Four different subpopulations (Ly6Cneg, Ly6Clow, Ly6Cint, and Ly6Chi) of CD8+ T cells were arbitrarily defined on the basis of differential expression of Ly6C Ag. By combining the processes of electronic cell sorting and automated cell deposition, small numbers of respective CD8+ T cell subpopulations were directly deposited into tissue culture wells in which mitogen-stimulated responses were studied. Anti-CD3-stimulated proliferation and IL-2 production were the strongest by Ly6Cneg/Ly6Clow T cells, moderate for Ly6Cint T cells, and highly deficient for Ly6Chi T cells. The level of IL-2 production for Ly6Cneg CD8+ T cells was comparable to that of conventional CD4+ Th cells. Allogeneic stimulator cells elicited a strong cytotoxic response by Ly6Cneg + low but not Ly6Chi CD8+ T cells in the absence of added lymphokines. When IL-2 was supplied in excess, anti-CD3 induced comparable levels of cell proliferation and cytotoxic activity in Ly6Cneg, Ly6Clow, Ly6Cint, and Ly6Chi CD8+ T cells whereas alloantigen stimulated an approximate fivefold higher cytotoxic response by Ly6Chi than Ly6Cneg + low CD8+ T cells. Stimulation of co-cultures of B10 (CD8b) Ly6Cneg + low and congenic B10.CD8a Ly6Chi CD8+ T cells in the absence of added lymphokines, followed by selective elimination of activated CD8.1+ (CD8.2+) T cells by anti-CD8.1 (anti-CD8.2) + C treatment, allowed the demonstration that help provided by Ly6Cneg + low T cells can be effectively used by both Ly6Cneg + low and Ly6Chi T cells in anti-CD3 and alloantigen induced proliferative and cytotoxic responses, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kung et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: