Objective: The objective was to determine the outcome when applying a set of proposed performance indicators on previously published reports from major incidents. Methods: A set of 20 different performance indicators were proposed. These indicators were applied to 13 reports from major incidents issued by the KAMEDO organization. Results: The most frequently reported problems were command and control at the scene (11/13) followed by communication and command and control at the strategic level. In 25% of the published reports there was enough information available to apply the performance indicators, and in these the goal and/or objective was met in 67%. Conclusion: Performance indicators for the medical management of major incidents and disaster can to a limited extent be applicable to retrospective studies. Performance indicators might be a tool for evaluating the medical response if reports are made with a different template. Further studies are needed in order to validate which indicators to use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rüter et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: