Key result
Older age links to ~85% higher recurrent ASCVD risk in very high-risk patients, alongside Black race.
Why the study?
The risk for ASCVD events may differ by sociodemographic factors among patients meeting the 2018 AHA/ACC very high risk definition, potentially leading to treatment disparities.
Does the risk of recurrent ASCVD events differ by sociodemographic factors among patients meeting the very high risk definition?
Cohort (n=77,101)
Does the risk of recurrent ASCVD events differ by sociodemographic factors among patients meeting the very high risk definition?
Significant sociodemographic disparities exist in recurrent ASCVD risk among patients already classified as very high risk, suggesting that incorporating these factors could improve risk stratification.
May support incorporating age/race into recurrent ASCVD stratification among very high-risk patients; hypothesis-generating, requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background The risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events may differ by sociodemographic factors among patients meeting the definition of very high risk according to the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guideline, leading to treatment disparities. We estimated the risk for recurrent ASCVD events among adults meeting the definition of very high risk by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in a US integrated healthcare system. Methods and Results The study cohort included Kaiser Permanente Southern California members aged ≥21 years with a history of clinical ASCVD on September 30, 2009. Very high risk for recurrent ASCVD was defined by a history of ≥2 major ASCVD events or a history of 1 major event along with ≥2 high-risk conditions. Patients were followed through 2015 for a first recurrent ASCVD event. Of 77 101 patients with ASCVD, 50.8% met the definition for very high risk. Among patients meeting the definition of very high risk, recurrent ASCVD rates were higher in older (>75 years) versus younger patients (21-40 years) (sex-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] 1.85; 1.23-2.79), non-Hispanic Black patients versus non-Hispanic White patients (age-, sex-adjusted HR, 1.32; 1.23-1.41), those who lived in neighborhoods with lower (<$35k) versus higher annual household income (≥$80k) (HR, 1.20; 1.11-1.30), or with lower (≥31.2%) versus higher education levels (<8.8% high school or lower) (HR, 1.26; 1.19-1.34). Conclusions Disparities in the risk for recurrent ASCVD events were present across sociodemographic factors among very high risk patients. The addition of sociodemographic factors to current definitions of very high risk could reduce health disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
An et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=77,101). Sociodemographic factors (age, race/ethnicity, income, education) vs. Reference sociodemographic groups was evaluated on First recurrent ASCVD event (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.23-2.79). Older age (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.23-2.79) and non-Hispanic Black race (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.23-1.41) were associated with higher recurrent ASCVD risk among very high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: