Key result
National-level swimming links to higher LnRMSSD, but differences disappear when accounting for competitive experience.
Why the study?
Interindividual differences in training history may determine heart rate variability profiles and account for differences observed between elite and subelite collegiate sprint-swimmers.
Does competitive status and experience affect heart rate variability profiles in collegiate sprint-swimmers during a 4-week standardized training period?
Observational (n=28)
Does competitive status and experience affect heart rate variability profiles in collegiate sprint-swimmers during a 4-week standardized training period?
Differences in heart rate variability profiles between elite and subelite collegiate sprint-swimmers are largely attributable to differences in training age and competitive experience.
Experience accounts for HRV differences by swimmer level; leaves open experience-adjusted monitoring in athlete cohorts.
Flatt, AA, Hornikel, B, Nakamura, FY, and Esco, MR. Effect of competitive status and experience on heart rate variability profiles in collegiate sprint-swimmers. J Strength Cond Res 36(10): 2898-2904, 2022-Interindividual differences in training history may be a determinant of heart rate variability (HRV) profiles in collegiate sprint-swimmers and may account for differences observed between elite and subelite athletes. We therefore compared HRV profiles among national-level and conference-level sprint-swimmers while accounting for individual swim-training history. Twenty-eight short-distance swimmers (18 men and 10 women) recorded postwaking HRV throughout a 4-week standardized training period. The 4-week mean (M) and coefficient of variation (CV, a marker of daily fluctuation) were calculated for resting heart rate (RHR) and the natural logarithm of the root mean square of successive differences (LnRMSSD). Swimmers were categorized as national-level (n = 12) or conference-level (n = 16) competitors. Years of competitive experience was documented for each individual to index training history. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. No sex-related differences were observed for any variables (p > 0.05). LnRMSSDM (effect size [ES] = 0.95), LnRMSSDCV (ES = -1.18), RHRCV (ES = -1.05), and competitive experience (ES = 1.23) differed between status groups (p < 0.05). Accounting for multicollinearity between competitive experience and LnRMSSD variables (p < 0.05), competitive experience remained associated with LnRMSSDM (r = 0.44, p = 0.02). With competitive experience included as a covariate, differences in LnRMSSDM between status groups disappeared (p > 0.05, ES = 0.31). National-level swimmers exhibit higher and more stable LnRMSSD than that of their conference-level teammates throughout standardized training. Differences in trend characteristics were attributed to training age. This information may assist practitioners with interpreting interindividual differences in HRV profiles throughout training periods among a mixed roster of athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Flatt et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Collegiate sprint-swimmers (n=28). National-level competitive status vs. Conference-level competitive status was evaluated on Heart rate variability profiles (LnRMSSDM, LnRMSSDCV, RHRCV) (ES 0.95, p=<0.05). National-level swimmers exhibited higher and more stable LnRMSSD than conference-level teammates (ES 0.95, p<0.05), though differences disappeared when accounting for competitive experience.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: