The past couple of years have seen some shocking exposes of violations of authorship in medical papers which suggest that one of the most important tenets in medical publishing – what it means to be named as an author on a paper – may not actually be as well accepted as previously believed. In
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Virginia Barbour (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: