PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 24, 2015Journal of the Association for Information Systems74 citations

Beyond being Systematic in Literature Reviews in IS

View Full Paper
RWRichard T. Watson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The dual goals of efficiency and effectiveness when writing a literature review are considered. Effectiveness is concerned with producing a synthesis of the published knowledge. A systematic approach to reviewing is at best a partial approach to efficiency because the foundations of the academic publishing system are rigidly locked into old technology. An outline for redesigning academic publishing to jump literature reviewing efficiency to a new level and enhance the productivity of many other aspects of scholarship is proposed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richard T. Watson (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11e81bfb24b1a422a57470https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.12
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.1956 · 4,427 citations
  2. 2Which World Bank Reports are Widely Read?2014 · 30 citations
  3. 3Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain1956 · 9,387 citations
  4. 4Journal of Information Technology2022 · 201 citations
  5. 5The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives2012 · 4,134 citations