Let \ₜ, t \≥ 1\\ be a stochastic process which satisfies the following set of assumptions: ASSUMPTION 1: For every t, Xₜ satisfies \{equation*}\{1}X_t = \α_1Xt - 1 + \α_2Xt - 2 + \⋯ + \α_kXt - k + u_t,\{equation*} where \α₁, \⋯, \αₖ are k finite real numbers (unknown parameters) and uₜ, t positive, are independent, identically distributed random variables with mean zero and a finite positive variance \σ². ASSUMPTION 2: The distribution of uₜ is continuous. (Actually \ₜ = 0\\ = 0 suffices.) ASSUMPTION 3: The roots m₁, \⋯, mₖ of the characteristic equation \{equation*}\{2}m^k - \α_1mk - 1 - \α_2mk - 2 - \⋯ - \α_k = 0,\{equation*} of (1), are distinct. ASSUMPTION 4: There is a unique root \ρ of (2) such that |\ρ| > 1, and |\ρ| > = 2, \⋯, k |mⱼ|. Here \ρ is identified with m₁ for convenience. Since complex roots enter in pairs, it follows from this assumption that \ρ is real. Note that there can be mⱼ, j > 1, such that |mⱼ| > 1. ASSUMPTION 5: For t non-positive, uₜ = 0. If Assumption 4 holds, the process \ₜ, t \ 1\\ is said to be (strongly) explosive, and the corresponding difference equation (1) is called an explosive (linear homogeneous) stochastic difference equation; this is the subject of the present paper. Under the assumptions above, it follows (cf., C. Jordan [5], p. 564, Mann and Wald [8], p. 178, and also the footnote on p. 22 of [10]) that Xₜ = \∑ᵗr = 1\∑ᵏq = 1 \λqmt - rquᵣ, t positive, and that \λq satisfy the relations \{equation*}\{3}\δ₁ₜ = \∑^kq = 1 \λ_qmt - 1_q,\ t = 1, 0, -1, \⋯, - (k - 2),\{equation*} where \δ₁ₜ = 1 if $t = 1$ and 0 otherwise. (Note that \∑ᵏq = 1\λq = 1.) For convenience, define the random variables \{equation*}\{4}Xi,t = \∑^tr = 1 mt - r_iu_r,\ i = 1, 2, \⋯, k, (m_1 = \ρ),\{equation*} so that Xi,t = 0 for t non-positive. Thus one may write Xₜ as follows: \{equation*}\{5}X_t = \λ_1X1,t + \λ_2X2,t + \⋯ + \λ_kXk,t.\{equation*} The first part of this paper is devoted to finding a consistent estimator of \ρ and its limit distribution. Consequently, in Section 3 some lemmas will be proved for use in the consistency proof (Theorem I). Similarly, in Section 5, some lemmas leading to the proof of the limit distribution of the estimator (Theorem II) will be given. In the second part, the consistency of the Least Squares (L.S.) or Maximum Likelihood (M.L.) estimators of the "structural parameters" \αᵢ of (1) will be considered (Theorem III). The procedure becomes much more involved because the direct application of the usual limit theorems is not possible, since the process under consideration is explosive. It is noteworthy that Lemmas 9, 10, 14-16, and Theorem I are rather general, in that they hold under the only global Assumptions 1-5 above, and the further requirement |mⱼ| < 1, j = 2, \⋯, k, so essential for the rest of the analysis of this paper, is unnecessary for them. The corresponding problem, in the case |\ρ| < 1, has been completely solved by Mann and Wald [8]. If $k = 1$ in (1), the results of this paper reduce to those obtained by Rubin [13], White [14], and T. W. Anderson [1]. The vector case has also been treated by Anderson in [1], but a comparison of the results in this case with those of the present paper shows that they do not imply each other except in the first order. In the latter case, however, both reduce to Rubin's [13] result. The available results on stochastic difference equations are summarized in a table at the end of the paper. Some of the details and computations omitted in this paper may be found in [10]. In the following section, some known lemmas related to stochastic convergence are collected and stated in a convenient form, as they will be constantly referred to in both parts of the paper. (For proofs, see [2], [3], [4], [6] and [9].)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
M. M. Rao (1961) studied this question.