This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: The Hallucinogen Rating Scale (HRS) has been widely used to measure the subjective effects of psychedelics and other psychoactive substances. Its advantages include a basis in phenomenological interviews and clinical studies, straightforward items, and broad coverage of psychedelic effects. Previous studies have attempted to resolve its factor structure but were limited by small samples of participants who took only one substance. Methods: We obtained 991 HRS questionnaires from the authors of 18 publications involving 13 psychoactive substances. Exploratory factor analysis was used to analyze its factor structure, and mixed-effects analyses of variance were used to compare HRS scores between drugs. The factor of meaningfulness also uniquely differentiated psychedelics from all other substances. Conclusions: These data show that the HRS is an intuitive and psychometrically sound tool for measuring the effects of psychedelic drugs, and it may also have utility for measuring the effects of other drugs and altered states of consciousness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calder et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: