Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Several studies have assessed the linkages between household factors and non-reimbursable medical costs over the years. However, there still exists a substantial gap in information on non-reimbursable medical costs in Canada that requires addressing. For instance, more information is needed about the extent and variation of the non-reimbursable medical costs across Canada. Even less is known about the prevalence of these costs among different population segments. We use the survey of household spending data to predict non-reimbursable medical costs across Canada’s 10 provinces. Methods In order to estimate the predictors of non-reimbursable medical costs in Canada, descriptive assessments and weighted cross-sectional regression analyses were conducted. Regression estimates on the Canadian survey of household spending data were performed to estimate the econometric predictors of non-reimbursable medical costs. Results Findings showed significant variation in non-reimbursable medical costs across the country’s 10 provincial regions. More importantly, they show that the share of earnings spent on non-reimbursable medical services is negatively associated with household earnings itself (estimated, coefficient of ln (Earnings) =-0.73, -0.73, -0.85, ∀ p <5% for 2004, 2009, 2015, respectively), while at the same time increasing with agedness (estimated, coefficient of Canadians aged>65 years = 0.58 & 0.82, ∀ p <5% versus Canadians aged < 19 years, for 2004, 2009, respectively), feminine gender (estimated, coefficient of feminine gender =0.28, 0.22, ∀ p <5% versus masculine gender for 2004, 2009, respectively), married status, living in large-sized families, and ill-health. Conclusion In Canada, non-reimbursable medical costs differ substantially by province and across socioeconomic, demographic, and health dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogwal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: