Background & Context: We describe the rationale, design, and initial validation of computational thinking (CT) assessments to pair with curricular lessons that integrate fractions and CT.Objective: We used cognitive models of CT (learning trajectories; LTs) to design assessments and obtained evidence to support a validity argumentMethod: We used the LTs and evidence-centered design to develop assessments that 144 Grade 3 and Grade 4 elementary students completed following the integrated instruction. We analyzed data using multiple psychometric approaches.Findings: The design approach and data analysis suggest that the assessments are well-suited to evaluate students’ CT knowledge, skills and abilities across multiple LTs.Implications: We show how to use LTs to design assessments that can yield valid inferences about students’ CT competencies; these methods can be adopted and extended by others to create additional assessments that can advance computer science education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gane et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: