Key result
Longitudinal 3-day pSOFA scores improve mortality prediction AUC by ~6% vs admission scores.
Why the study?
Static pSOFA scores fail to capture changes in clinical condition or treatment response during a PICU stay, prompting evaluation of longitudinal pSOFA scores for dynamic mortality prediction.
Does longitudinal pSOFA scoring improve the prediction of 30-day in-hospital mortality compared to admission-day pSOFA score in PICU patients?
Cohort (n=9,146)
No
Does longitudinal pSOFA scoring improve the prediction of 30-day in-hospital mortality compared to admission-day pSOFA score in PICU patients?
Effect estimate: AUC improvement 6.4% (95% CI 6.3-6.6%)
Longitudinal pSOFA scores significantly improve the accuracy of 30-day in-hospital mortality prediction in PICU patients compared to using only the admission-day score.
May improve PICU mortality prediction; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVES: The pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score was designed to track illness severity and predict mortality in critically ill children. Most commonly, pSOFA at a point in time is used to assess a static patient condition. However, this approach has a significant drawback because it fails to consider any changes in a patients' condition during their PICU stay and, especially, their response to initial critical care treatment. We aimed to evaluate the performance of longitudinal pSOFA scores for predicting mortality. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Quaternary 40-bed PICU. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the PICU between 2015 and 2021 with at least 24 hours of ICU stay. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We calculated daily pSOFA scores up to 30 days, or until death or discharge from the PICU, if earlier. We used the joint longitudinal and time-to-event data model for the dynamic prediction of 30-day in-hospital mortality. The dataset, which included 9146 patients with a 30-day in-hospital mortality of 2.6%, was divided randomly into training (75%) and validation (25%) subsets, and subjected to 40 repeated stratified cross-validations. We used dynamic area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the discriminative performance of the model. Compared with the admission-day pSOFA score, AUC for predicting mortality between days 5 and 30 was improved on average by 6.4% (95% CI, 6.3-6.6%) using longitudinal pSOFA scores from the first 3 days and 9.2% (95% CI, 9.0-9.5%) using scores from the first 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with admission-day pSOFA score, longitudinal pSOFA scores improved the accuracy of mortality prediction in PICU patients at a single center. The pSOFA score has the potential to be used dynamically for the evaluation of patient conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akhondi‐Asl et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Critically ill children in PICU (n=9,146). Longitudinal pSOFA scores vs. Admission-day pSOFA score was evaluated on AUC for predicting mortality between days 5 and 30 (AUC improvement 6.4%, 95% CI 6.3-6.6%). Longitudinal pSOFA scores from the first 3 days improved the AUC for predicting mortality between days 5 and 30 by 6.4% (95% CI, 6.3-6.6%) compared with the admission-day pSOFA score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: