The cusp-overlap technique during TAVR was associated with lower odds of new post-procedural conduction disturbance compared to the traditional technique (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24-0.82; P=0.009).
Cohort (n=203)
No
Does the cusp-overlap technique reduce new conduction disturbance and permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding prostheses?
The cusp-overlap technique during TAVR with self-expanding prostheses is associated with shallower implantation depth and significantly lower odds of new post-procedural conduction disturbances.
Effect estimate: OR 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.82)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.2% vs 26.8%
p-value: p=0.009
Objective: Self-expanding (SE) transcatheter aortic prostheses (THV) have been associated with an increased risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPMI), particularly with deeper implantations in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) that result in more atrioventricular conduction system damage, leading to higher rates of post-procedural conduction disturbances (CDs) and subsequently more PPMIs. The cusp-overlap technique (COT) is designed to provide better visualisation of the LVOT during implantation, aiming to achieve a shallower implantation depth (ID) and potentially reduce both post-procedural CDs and PPMIs. This study seeks to compare the traditional three-cusp coplanar view technique (3CT) with the newer COT in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: From March 2018 to April 2020, a total of 586 patients underwent TAVR at the university clinic in Kiel. Among them, 226 patients who received SE prostheses were included in the study. After applying exclusion criteria, a final cohort of 203 patients was analysed. Of these, 106 patients underwent TAVR using the COT, while 97 patients underwent TAVR using the 3CT. The primary endpoints of the study were the occurrence of new CD and PPMI within 30 days post-procedure. Secondary endpoints included various post-TAVR events as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) safety criteria. A specific focus was placed on assessing the risk of high valve implantation according to VARC-3 criteria, specifically paravalvular insufficiency, valve embolisation, and coronary occlusion. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare outcomes between the COT and 3CT groups. Results: Implantation depths were significantly lower in the COT group compared to the 3CT group, with ID values from the NCC and LCC being 2.7 mm (±1.5) and 2.8 mm (±1.5) for the COT, and 5.4 mm (±3) and 6.6 mm (±2.6) for the 3CT (p < 0.001 for both). The incidence of high-grade CD, particularly Atrioventricular Block (AVB) II and III, was significantly higher in the 3CT group (26.8%) compared to the COT group (13.2%) (p = 0.023). The overall 30-day PPMI rate was 18.2% (n = 37), with a significant difference between the COT and 3CT groups (12.2% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.021). The primary indication for PPMI was permanent high-grade AVB occurring during or after TAVR, accounting for 95% of cases. No cases of TAVR embolisation, acute coronary occlusion or related syndromes were observed within the first 30 days post-procedure. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality or post-procedural paravalvular insufficiency between the groups. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the COT remained independently associated with lower odds of new post-procedural CD after adjustment for prior right bundle branch block (RBBB), prior first-degree AVB, predilatation, valve size and coronary artery disease (odds ratio OR 0.45, 95% confidence interval CI 0.24–0.82, p = 0.009). For 30-day PPMI, the cusp-overlap technique demonstrated a borderline association with lower adjusted odds (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20–1.02, p = 0.057), while prior RBBB was independently associated with increased PPMI risk (OR 3.54, 95% CI 1.22–10.28, p = 0.020). Conclusions: The COT was associated with shallower implantation depth and lower rates of new post-procedural CD after multivariable adjustment. The association with reduced 30-day PPMI remained directionally consistent but was borderline after adjustment. These findings support the potential value of COT as a procedural strategy to reduce conduction-related complications after TAVR with self-expanding prostheses.
Salem et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=203). Cusp-overlap technique (COT) vs. Traditional three-cusp coplanar view technique (3CT) was evaluated on New conduction disturbance within 30 days post-procedure (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.82, p=0.009). The cusp-overlap technique during TAVR was associated with lower odds of new post-procedural conduction disturbance compared to the traditional technique (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24-0.82; P=0.009).