Key result
ILR insertion angle, age, LVH, and specific ECG amplitudes independently associate with ILR QRS amplitude.
Why the study?
Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P-wave sensing in ILR were unknown.
What are the determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P-wave sensing in implantable loop recorders?
Observational (n=220)
What are the determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P-wave sensing in implantable loop recorders?
ILR insertion angle, specific ECG lead amplitudes, age, and LVH are key determinants of ILR QRS amplitude and P-wave detectability, which may help optimize ILR placement.
ILR insertion angle and ECG amplitudes may affect QRS sensing; leaves open whether targeted placement improves detection in prospective studies.
Introduction – Determining factors for sufficient QRS amplitude and discernible P-wave sensing in ILR are unknown. We aimed to investigate determining factors and ILR implantation angle that may improve QRS complex and P-wave sensing in ILR. Methods and Results – We retrospectively reviewed 220 patients who underwent ILR implantation or follow-up analysis. Patient demographic, clinical, echocardiography, electrocardiography, heart angle, and ILR angle data were collected as predictor variables. Associations between ILR QRS amplitude/P-wave detectability and each predictor variable were investigated. Univariate linear regression showed that ILR QRS amplitude was significantly associated with age, height, ILR angle, and QRS amplitudes of 12-Lead ECG [lead I, II, -aVR (inverted aVR), aVF, V1-V6] and Holter ECG (lead V3, V5). Among discrete variables, only left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) affected ILR QRS amplitude (P=0.016). A multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that ILR angle (β= -0.008, P<0.001), lead -aVR amplitude (β=0.469, P=0.003), Holter lead V5 amplitude (β=0.116, p=0.049), Age (β=-0.005, P=0.014), and LVH (β=0.213, P= 0.031) were independent determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Logistic regression revealed that heart angle significantly affected ILR P-wave detectability (β=0.12, P=0.008). Multiple logistic regression revealed that heart angle (β=0.121, P= 0.013) and lead V1 amplitude (β=28.1, P= 0.034) were independent determinants of ILR P-wave detectability. Conclusion – ILR insertion angle, lead -aVR QRS amplitude, Holter lead V5 QRS amplitude, age, and LVH are determinants of ILR QRS amplitude. Heart angle and lead V1 P-wave amplitude of 12-Lead ECG are determinants of ILR P-wave detectability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahn et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Implantable loop recorder (ILR) implantation (n=220). Predictors of ILR sensing (ILR angle, ECG amplitudes, age, LVH) was evaluated on ILR QRS amplitude and P-wave detectability (β -0.008, p=<0.001). ILR insertion angle (β=-0.008, P<0.001), lead -aVR amplitude, Holter lead V5 amplitude, age, and left ventricular hypertrophy were identified as independent determinants of ILR QRS amplitude.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: